northeast2

Champion Author
New York
Posts:2,671 Points:752,030 Joined:Mar 2008
|
Message Posted: Sep 2, 2010 10:40:41 PM
Ah, so the Bureau of Land Management is the anti-MMS - you lease it, you don't develop it. Wonder if all of the lessees are fronts for oil companies.
|
SVmike

Champion Author
California
Posts:1,426 Points:307,850 Joined:Dec 2009
|
Message Posted: Sep 1, 2010 11:57:32 AM
A bunch of do-gooder politicians, again duped by thinking they can pick winners
|
bluehawk43

All-Star Author
Arkansas
Posts:679 Points:503,890 Joined:May 2009
|
Message Posted: Sep 1, 2010 7:57:04 AM
That's our government in action.
|
NekoSJG

Champion Author
San Jose
Posts:3,230 Points:570,805 Joined:Jun 2010
|
Message Posted: Sep 1, 2010 7:40:48 AM
Speculators again? BLM needs to charge a hefty rents to get the speculators out of the system and allow revenue and value added development to progress.
|
chemist74

Champion Author
Cleveland
Posts:12,377 Points:2,177,015 Joined:Apr 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 1, 2010 7:01:08 AM
It would be interesting to see what the lease agreement requires. even when the government was giving away government land to the public, the government required the person claiming the land to make improvements.
How much are the groups required to pay annually for these leases?
|
GingoutMD

Champion Author
Maryland
Posts:2,302 Points:473,680 Joined:Jan 2010
|
Message Posted: Sep 1, 2010 6:49:46 AM
It would seem that a team that supports the BLM should be able to come up with a method to legally rescind the false applications and take back that land or at least offer the land to some firm who will develop it for solar generation.
|
car253

Champion Author
Ohio
Posts:4,195 Points:1,031,620 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Sep 1, 2010 6:27:54 AM
Is anyone surprised?
|